Reply to Merli et al.
نویسندگان
چکیده
TO THE EDITOR—We thank Merli et al for reporting their analyses of lymphocyte and CD4 + T-cell levels during treatment with ribavirin (RBV)–containing hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for a group of patients with advanced liver disease and HCV/ human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) coinfection [1]. We agree with the authors that a decline in lymphocyte and CD4 + T-cell levels, in theory, would be most concerning in this population, particularly for those with uncontrolled HIV-1 infection or advanced HIV-1 disease. The authors are correct in noting that only a small subset of subjects in our combined analyses of HCV DAA clinical trials had cirrhosis and HCV/ HIV-1 coinfection, all from the TURQUOISE -I trial of ombitasvir/paritapre-vir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir and RBV [2, 3]. We also note that eligible subjects in TURQUOISE-I were to be on a stable an-tiretroviral treatment regimen with plasma HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL [3]. Despite the presence of advanced liver disease and HIV-1 coinfection for all patients in the Merli et al analysis, their results were consistent with those from our analyses, with observations of declines in absolute lymphocyte and CD4 + T-cell levels without an associated change in CD4 + T-cell percentage during treatment with DAAs plus RBV. Although the changes appeared somewhat greater in the authors' analysis (particularly CD4 +), this effect of RBV-containing treatment generally resolved after treatment, consistent with our analyses. The authors reported that 4 patients experienced a bacterial infection between baseline and posttreatment week 4. It would be interesting to understand if these infections were temporally associated with reductions in lymphocyte levels; a temporal association between severe RBV-related lymphopenia and infection was not apparent in our analyses, although the number of cases was small [2]. Fortunately, the infections described by the authors were not reported as opportunistic infections, most were mild, all patients recovered after antibiotic therapy, and no treatment discontinuations due to infection were reported, again consistent with our analyses and those specifically from TURQUOISE -I [3]. One limitation of the Merli et al analysis is the lack of data from a comparator group of patients who received combination DAA regimens without RBV. Because inclusion of RBV is often recommended to improve treatment efficacy, particularly in patients with more advanced HCV disease, the lack of an RBV-free comparator group for this population is understandable. Furthermore , based on our analyses, one can assume that RBV was …
منابع مشابه
Reply to “A Critical Review of Proximal Fibular Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis”
Proximal fibular osteotomy is a surgical procedure that has evoked significant interest and controversy in the recent past. Vaishya et al have made a significant effort in compiling the available evidence on the topic. However, we would like to make some significant suggestions and additions to the findings in their manuscript.
متن کاملEnvironmental gamma radiation: a comment (Letter to the Editor)
Editor, I read the recent publication by Toossi et al. with a great interest (1). Toossi et al. concluded that “Average gonad and bone marrow doses for North Khorasan, Boshehr and Hormozgan provinces were less than the corresponding values for normal area (2).” There are some facts on this report to be concerned. I agree that the detected levels might be high in the mentioned area, but th...
متن کاملLetter to editor
Dear Prof. Mozdarani,I would like to discuss about some important aspects regarding the article published in, "Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2012 10(2): 89-94“ with title of “Patient doses from X-ray computed tomography examinations by a single-array detector unit: Axial versus spiral mode" by Ghavami et al. (1), so according to journal policy and in suitable manner please ask the authors to rep...
متن کاملOn Words, Tests, and Applications: Reply to Faith et al
Faith et al. (2003) strongly criticize our paper (Posadas et al. 2001). Their criticisms are based on what they consider our “ill definitions” and “erroneous applications” of the words complementarity, endemism, and biodiversity. The objectives of our reply to Faith et al. are to demonstrate that their criticisms do not satisfy epistemological and methodological tenets and to compare some aspec...
متن کاملReply to “ Reply to ‘ Comment on “ Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range –
The reply by Petron et al. [2012a] to my comment, Levi [2012], on their paper, Petron et al. [2012], defends their original conclusion: fugitive emissions in an area that they observed in 2008 were likely larger those indicated by previous estimates. The reply also claims to have now better characterized the uncertainties in their and my approaches. In particular, they question the representati...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
دوره 62 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016